<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for AskTorah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asktorah.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asktorah.com</link>
	<description>Torah and the Hebrews Religion of Moses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:33:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Do You Think About Torah by Andre Isakandar</title>
		<link>http://asktorah.com/2010/what-do-you-think-about-torah/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre Isakandar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asktorah.com/?p=1024619#comment-369</guid>
		<description>the proverb from Fatimid Kingdom;the human not function and have beauty if not have 2 hand.and the torah have name alkhidir not els,please recomended this item</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the proverb from Fatimid Kingdom;the human not function and have beauty if not have 2 hand.and the torah have name alkhidir not els,please recomended this item</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Exodus Chapter 20 by Arnona</title>
		<link>http://asktorah.com/2010/exodus-chapter-20/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 12:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asktorah.com/?p=1024322#comment-351</guid>
		<description>I keep coming back to this section, and the beginning of the next.  Everywhere around me, the &quot;terms&quot; have been cut off at the end of verse 14.  I believe that what should also be on every doorpost and included in the &quot;10 terms&quot; are verses 19-23.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep coming back to this section, and the beginning of the next.  Everywhere around me, the &#8220;terms&#8221; have been cut off at the end of verse 14.  I believe that what should also be on every doorpost and included in the &#8220;10 terms&#8221; are verses 19-23.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Exodus Chapter 20 by Arnona</title>
		<link>http://asktorah.com/2010/exodus-chapter-20/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 13:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asktorah.com/?p=1024322#comment-350</guid>
		<description>Those who do not keep the commandments seem to be included in those who hate YHWH, imo.  Their children will suffer for that - both by inheriting a bad attitude toward Almighty, and by being recompensed by Almighty.

Remember the sabbath - zakar - the same word is used when YHVH remembered Noah, and when YHVH remembered the covenant with Abraham and Isaac and Jacob to bring the Hebrews out of Egypt.  It has deeper connotations than simply having it in mind.  It is also the word used in verse 21, when YHVH says that every place YHVH causes The Name to be mentioned, YHVH will come unto and bless those who offer burnt offerings (olah) and peace (shelem) offerings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those who do not keep the commandments seem to be included in those who hate YHWH, imo.  Their children will suffer for that &#8211; both by inheriting a bad attitude toward Almighty, and by being recompensed by Almighty.</p>
<p>Remember the sabbath &#8211; zakar &#8211; the same word is used when YHVH remembered Noah, and when YHVH remembered the covenant with Abraham and Isaac and Jacob to bring the Hebrews out of Egypt.  It has deeper connotations than simply having it in mind.  It is also the word used in verse 21, when YHVH says that every place YHVH causes The Name to be mentioned, YHVH will come unto and bless those who offer burnt offerings (olah) and peace (shelem) offerings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Genesis Chapter 11 by Arnona</title>
		<link>http://asktorah.com/2010/genesis-11/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asktorah.com/?p=1024157#comment-349</guid>
		<description>The generations listed here are concise - no mincing of words to list names of sons, and daughters are now mentioned as well.  

Of interest is that the numbered days in Gen 6:3 (120 years) are not yet enforced, as there are longer lives listed for Shem&#039;s ancestors.

Noah was 500 when he had Shem, and lived 950 years.

Shem was 100 and had Arpachshad two years after the flood (at 102?) and lived 500 (502?) years

Arpachshad was 35 when he had Shelah, and lived 535 years

Shelah was 35 when he had Eber, and lived 433 years

Eber was 34 when he had Peleg, and lived 464 years

Peleg was 30 when he had Reu, and lived 239 years

Reu was 32 when he had Serug, and lived 239 years

Serug  was 30 when he had Nahor, and lived 230 years

Nahor was 29 when he had Terah, and lived 148 years

Terah was 70 when he had Abram, Nahor and Haran (triplets?), and lived 205 years

Using these calculations, (if I added correctly) Noah was still alive at the birth of Abram (as were Shem and Arpachshad and Shelah and Eber).  Noah died 50 years later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The generations listed here are concise &#8211; no mincing of words to list names of sons, and daughters are now mentioned as well.  </p>
<p>Of interest is that the numbered days in Gen 6:3 (120 years) are not yet enforced, as there are longer lives listed for Shem&#8217;s ancestors.</p>
<p>Noah was 500 when he had Shem, and lived 950 years.</p>
<p>Shem was 100 and had Arpachshad two years after the flood (at 102?) and lived 500 (502?) years</p>
<p>Arpachshad was 35 when he had Shelah, and lived 535 years</p>
<p>Shelah was 35 when he had Eber, and lived 433 years</p>
<p>Eber was 34 when he had Peleg, and lived 464 years</p>
<p>Peleg was 30 when he had Reu, and lived 239 years</p>
<p>Reu was 32 when he had Serug, and lived 239 years</p>
<p>Serug  was 30 when he had Nahor, and lived 230 years</p>
<p>Nahor was 29 when he had Terah, and lived 148 years</p>
<p>Terah was 70 when he had Abram, Nahor and Haran (triplets?), and lived 205 years</p>
<p>Using these calculations, (if I added correctly) Noah was still alive at the birth of Abram (as were Shem and Arpachshad and Shelah and Eber).  Noah died 50 years later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Genesis Chapter 8 by Arnona</title>
		<link>http://asktorah.com/2010/genesis-chapter-8/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asktorah.com/?p=1024144#comment-348</guid>
		<description>I do have to wonder though.  YHWH said &quot;I will not again curse the ground .. for man&#039;s sake .. neither smite .. every thing living&quot;.  This is not a promise that mankind will not be destroyed - it is a commitment not to destroy every living thing.  Animals and plants would be included among living things.

The covenant coming up in the next chapter further defines this, by adding all living things to the covenant.  So, all flesh will not be destroyed by waters and the earth will not again be destroyed by waters.  This does not specify that mankind is safe through all of his endeavors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do have to wonder though.  YHWH said &#8220;I will not again curse the ground .. for man&#8217;s sake .. neither smite .. every thing living&#8221;.  This is not a promise that mankind will not be destroyed &#8211; it is a commitment not to destroy every living thing.  Animals and plants would be included among living things.</p>
<p>The covenant coming up in the next chapter further defines this, by adding all living things to the covenant.  So, all flesh will not be destroyed by waters and the earth will not again be destroyed by waters.  This does not specify that mankind is safe through all of his endeavors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Genesis Chapter 10 by Arnona</title>
		<link>http://asktorah.com/2010/genesis-chapter-10/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 11:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asktorah.com/?p=1024152#comment-347</guid>
		<description>The generational list in Gen 5 was comprised of the firstborns.  Now we have la list that show multiple sons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The generational list in Gen 5 was comprised of the firstborns.  Now we have la list that show multiple sons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Where Are Your Mashiyach by Arnona</title>
		<link>http://asktorah.com/2011/where-are-your-mashiyach/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 11:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asktorah.com/?p=1024799#comment-346</guid>
		<description>True - and good point that this needs clarification.  

There were no men (or women!) who were chosen by other people to serve in the mishkan - it was by blood only (and only those with no physical defects) - and a diploma would not grant access to the priesthood.

Modern day &quot;pastors&quot;, &quot;ministers&quot;, &quot;popes&quot;, &quot;reverands&quot;, &quot;priests&quot; and &quot;rabbis&quot; would have to join another nation to continue in their careers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True &#8211; and good point that this needs clarification.  </p>
<p>There were no men (or women!) who were chosen by other people to serve in the mishkan &#8211; it was by blood only (and only those with no physical defects) &#8211; and a diploma would not grant access to the priesthood.</p>
<p>Modern day &#8220;pastors&#8221;, &#8220;ministers&#8221;, &#8220;popes&#8221;, &#8220;reverands&#8221;, &#8220;priests&#8221; and &#8220;rabbis&#8221; would have to join another nation to continue in their careers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Where Are Your Mashiyach by admin</title>
		<link>http://asktorah.com/2011/where-are-your-mashiyach/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 04:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asktorah.com/?p=1024799#comment-345</guid>
		<description>&quot;They had no rabbis or ministers.&quot; - Rabbis as in the sense of rabbis in today&#039;s world no, but the Priest was considered to do the ministering for YHWH.

Exodus 28,1 YHWH saying to Moses: &quot;And bring thou near unto thee Aaron thy brother, and his sons with him, from among the children of Israel, that they may minister unto Me in the priest&#039;s office.....&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They had no rabbis or ministers.&#8221; &#8211; Rabbis as in the sense of rabbis in today&#8217;s world no, but the Priest was considered to do the ministering for YHWH.</p>
<p>Exodus 28,1 YHWH saying to Moses: &#8220;And bring thou near unto thee Aaron thy brother, and his sons with him, from among the children of Israel, that they may minister unto Me in the priest&#8217;s office&#8230;..&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Deuteronomy Chapter 28 by Where Are Your Mashiyach – AskTorah</title>
		<link>http://asktorah.com/2010/deuteronomy-chapter-28/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>Where Are Your Mashiyach – AskTorah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 01:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asktorah.com/?p=1024564#comment-344</guid>
		<description>[...] you back from exile! At no point in Torah has YHWH proclaimed that a king will save you! In fact, Deut 28:36 specifically states that you and the king you set over you will be exiled and serve other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you back from exile! At no point in Torah has YHWH proclaimed that a king will save you! In fact, Deut 28:36 specifically states that you and the king you set over you will be exiled and serve other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Society of Torah by TorahChai</title>
		<link>http://asktorah.com/2011/society-of-torah/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>TorahChai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 02:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asktorah.com/?p=1024795#comment-343</guid>
		<description>My phrasing was poor in simply choosing ‘negation of women’s rights’; perhaps a better way to state it would be that the perception is that women’s rights are curtailed or negated in light of feminism, when Torah is examined by people in modern society. 

I will address that in one of the future postings.

-TC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My phrasing was poor in simply choosing ‘negation of women’s rights’; perhaps a better way to state it would be that the perception is that women’s rights are curtailed or negated in light of feminism, when Torah is examined by people in modern society. </p>
<p>I will address that in one of the future postings.</p>
<p>-TC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Genesis Chapter 9 by Arnona</title>
		<link>http://asktorah.com/2010/genesis-chapter-9/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 00:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asktorah.com/?p=1024148#comment-342</guid>
		<description>Excellent points,  The critical piece would be - did Lamech return and hunt down the man/men he slew, or did it happen at the instance of the harm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent points,  The critical piece would be &#8211; did Lamech return and hunt down the man/men he slew, or did it happen at the instance of the harm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Genesis Chapter 9 by Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://asktorah.com/2010/genesis-chapter-9/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 00:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asktorah.com/?p=1024148#comment-341</guid>
		<description>It is my opinion that Lamech should not even under present circumstances be considered a life for life murderer.  I believe  Gen 4:24 could be talking about a self defense situation, if so, we are talking about a man who would have been sent to a city of refuge....not killed.

Perhaps the removal of livelihood is exactly what happens when you have to go to a city of refuge... even though it is not a premeditated thing... there is an extreme loss of freedom until the cohen hagadol dies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is my opinion that Lamech should not even under present circumstances be considered a life for life murderer.  I believe  Gen 4:24 could be talking about a self defense situation, if so, we are talking about a man who would have been sent to a city of refuge&#8230;.not killed.</p>
<p>Perhaps the removal of livelihood is exactly what happens when you have to go to a city of refuge&#8230; even though it is not a premeditated thing&#8230; there is an extreme loss of freedom until the cohen hagadol dies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Society of Torah by admin</title>
		<link>http://asktorah.com/2011/society-of-torah/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 18:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asktorah.com/?p=1024795#comment-340</guid>
		<description>I would argue the &#039;Negation of Women’s Rights&#039;. Can you give evidence of this in Torah?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would argue the &#8216;Negation of Women’s Rights&#8217;. Can you give evidence of this in Torah?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Numbers Chapter 18 by Society of Torah – AskTorah</title>
		<link>http://asktorah.com/2010/numbers-chapter-18/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>Society of Torah – AskTorah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 18:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asktorah.com/?p=1024459#comment-339</guid>
		<description>[...] There is a class of people, also determined by bloodline, which is segregated from the general population of the descendents of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob – The Levites, which also contains yet another segregated bloodline - The Priests (Kohenim). Num 8:14-22 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There is a class of people, also determined by bloodline, which is segregated from the general population of the descendents of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob – The Levites, which also contains yet another segregated bloodline - The Priests (Kohenim). Num 8:14-22 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Leviticus Chapter 25 by Society of Torah – AskTorah</title>
		<link>http://asktorah.com/2010/leviticus-chapter-25/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Society of Torah – AskTorah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 18:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asktorah.com/?p=1024419#comment-338</guid>
		<description>[...] piece of it either. All possessions of property must be returned in the Yovel, or Jubilee year (Lev. 25). This keeps it in the family even through duress, fiscal irresponsibility and hard times. Can you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] piece of it either. All possessions of property must be returned in the Yovel, or Jubilee year (Lev. 25). This keeps it in the family even through duress, fiscal irresponsibility and hard times. Can you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No Words by Arnona</title>
		<link>http://asktorah.com/2011/no-words/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asktorah.com/?p=1024790#comment-337</guid>
		<description>Good point.  The wording leaves too much applicability.  The phrase &quot;control over our functions and dysfunctions&quot; was meant to paraphrase that YHVH is Who makes a person slow of tongue, or speech, or deaf, or blind.  I equated that my brain could not connect to form an article (writer&#039;s block) to that control that YHVH has over our physical defects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point.  The wording leaves too much applicability.  The phrase &#8220;control over our functions and dysfunctions&#8221; was meant to paraphrase that YHVH is Who makes a person slow of tongue, or speech, or deaf, or blind.  I equated that my brain could not connect to form an article (writer&#8217;s block) to that control that YHVH has over our physical defects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No Words by admin</title>
		<link>http://asktorah.com/2011/no-words/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asktorah.com/?p=1024790#comment-336</guid>
		<description>&quot;control over our functions and dysfunctions&quot;

Not sure if I agree with this one. The &#039;free will&#039; of mankind, the decision Adam made when listening to Eve, or when Eve listened to the serpent, the free will of mankind has in most instances been a disappointment to YHVH and not something under  control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;control over our functions and dysfunctions&#8221;</p>
<p>Not sure if I agree with this one. The &#8216;free will&#8217; of mankind, the decision Adam made when listening to Eve, or when Eve listened to the serpent, the free will of mankind has in most instances been a disappointment to YHVH and not something under  control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Genesis Chapter 4 by No Words – AskTorah</title>
		<link>http://asktorah.com/2010/genesis-chapter-4/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>No Words – AskTorah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 13:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asktorah.com/?p=1024125#comment-335</guid>
		<description>[...] find some insight in order to describe or define what I’m going through and I grabbed hold of  Shemot 4:10-11. Moses is trying to shirk his newly appointed duty by claiming to have no words, being “slow of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] find some insight in order to describe or define what I’m going through and I grabbed hold of  Shemot 4:10-11. Moses is trying to shirk his newly appointed duty by claiming to have no words, being “slow of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Genesis Chapter 9 by Arnona</title>
		<link>http://asktorah.com/2010/genesis-chapter-9/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asktorah.com/?p=1024148#comment-334</guid>
		<description>Here we have a change in the course of things.  No longer is there the excuse for a murder that the murderer is avenged - like Cain and Lamech.  Now we have the specific command that YHVH requires a life for a life - which is the precurser to the command that is given &quot;an eye for an eye&quot;.  

Bloodshed will now have the punishment of bloodshed and will be meted out by men.  

Unclear here is the life for life aspect, since Cain had his livelihood removed, it could be possible that removal of livelihood is still in play if blood is not shed (strangling, blunt force, etc.).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we have a change in the course of things.  No longer is there the excuse for a murder that the murderer is avenged &#8211; like Cain and Lamech.  Now we have the specific command that YHVH requires a life for a life &#8211; which is the precurser to the command that is given &#8220;an eye for an eye&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Bloodshed will now have the punishment of bloodshed and will be meted out by men.  </p>
<p>Unclear here is the life for life aspect, since Cain had his livelihood removed, it could be possible that removal of livelihood is still in play if blood is not shed (strangling, blunt force, etc.).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Genesis Chapter 8 by Arnona</title>
		<link>http://asktorah.com/2010/genesis-chapter-8/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asktorah.com/?p=1024144#comment-333</guid>
		<description>It is important to note that God remembered Noah and every living thing.  In Lev 26, YHVH says that there will be remembrance of the covenant with Abraham and there will be remembrance of the land.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is important to note that God remembered Noah and every living thing.  In Lev 26, YHVH says that there will be remembrance of the covenant with Abraham and there will be remembrance of the land.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

